Swipe to go to another post.
Victim in Charlottesville Beating Video Facing Arrest. He's not arrested yet.
Thank you for clarification.
Something fishy about the whole thing and the police.
Not that the OP's credibility is in question or anything, but there is nothing provided in this post to verify his claim.
The guy? Does "the guy' have a name?
The guy was charged with assault - for fighting back. So, it had nothing to do with anything that might have happened before or after this photo of 'the guy'?
We'll never know - the OP requires that we take his word for it.
There's always google.
See Bud, that's why it is posted as a question and not as an opinion.
I am questioning it.
I'll be right back. Let me google 'the guy that got beat up in Charlottesville '. I'm sure it will clear everything up!
Sysnters links were more helpful. It seems your headline and link simply leaves a lot of unexplained details Vic. It's almost as if you are purposefully not telling the whole story. Tell me it isn't true.
I bet you wish you were there beating people up.
No Vic - I'm a Trump supporter. We're not prone to violence.
good one Bud. A real knee slapper.
Knee slapper? Hmm, violent tendencies?
Here'e the story back in August.
Today police haven't released why they MAY arrest DeAndre Harris, the person who was attacked and beaten.
So, I see he was arrested for beating a black man. So, the charges wern't "for fighting back" as the OP claimed. That's interesting.
Boy you didn't bother to read past the headline.
DeAndre Harris the black guy was the one beaten.
Alex Michael Ramos was the guy arrested for beating Harris back in August.
Now the Police want to arrest Harris the guy who was beaten ... however the police haven't said why.
Something is fishy with this whole Charlottesville attacks.
"Something is fishy with this whole Charlottesville attacks." - Yes, of course! The left has mis-characterized the whole event and those involved from the get go.
Excerpt from Alexander Hamilton Stephens "Cornerstone Speech" (He was VP of the confederacy.
"Our new government is founded upon exactly the opposite ideas; its foundations are laid, its cornerstone rests, upon the great truth that the negro is not equal to the white man; that slavery, subordination to the superior race, is his natural and normal condition. This, our new government, is the first, in the history of the world, based upon this great physical, philosophical, and moral truth. This truth has been slow in the process of its development, like all other truths in the various departments of science."
There's your 'truth' Budwick. Confederate flags and symbols are about restoring 'whites to their superior position in society'.
There is no mischaracterization except by racists who want to pretend they are not racists.
Well, this is a peculiar place to put this comment.
Was your picture one of Alexander Hamilton Stephens ?
Look Vic, nobody I know of disagrees that slavery was a bad and immoral thing. Thank the God you don't believe in, that Republicans you despise, pushed hard enough all those years ago to get the slavery issue corrected.
Erasing history and historic statues, markers, books, places of interest, etc will not change the past and it would deprive the future of learning anything from the past that had been erased.
I realize the left is doing everything in it's diminishing power to demonize and delegitimize America. And, I think that's what this is really all about. But, let's assume that you deny that - then stick to my first argument.
History is in books and museums. No one wants to take those away. Statues in parks are not about history, they are about glorifying people and events.
Whatever you want to pretend that rally was about it was about glorifying racism.
The vast majority of confederate monuments were erected during times of racial strife in America as a way for supremacists to reassert their values in the local towns and villages.
That speech is relevant because it ends any argument that those statues and about a valid war.
You might as well argue that monuments in praise of Hitler, Stalin, and Kim should be erected to preserve history.
How is it that you managed to hold in all this anger regarding those statues for 100+ years?
Or, is it simply that being pissed about them now better fits your agenda?
PS - your remarks about history are pure BS. The left has been scrubbing history for decades and will continue to do so - left unchecked.
This graph says a lot
and I guess what you consider 'history' matters.
The Post is a liberal rag more prone to lying than yourself!
History is history! Past event are what they are - good, bad , ugly. Not looking at a statue will not change the past. Not teaching people about the past increases the odds that they will repeat the mistakes.
So you do see the connection between the erecting of those monuments and the outrage over civil rights. Cool.
No, I don't. Did you know that the Charlottesville statue of Robert E Lee was dedicated in 1924?
That happens to be a low point in your graph. Do you see any connection to that fact and your claim?
One counter example . Cool
Well, it happened to be the one centered on your chosen location for this post, so....
Except it was commissioned in1917. So there's that
And destroyed in 2017.
Wow! I never knew that. You are totally right about the purpose of statues. The statues are of people still venerated by many in the South. It has absolutely nothing with (this nonsense about the Left) rewriting history.
AH yes they all jumped on the bandwagon to try and erase history. A statue is to be looked at not prayed to or whatever, so they are just like art and not much more.
If the moderator who started this post wants to relate something totally unrelated to the specific point being discussed about this post and pic, but relative to racists who pretend they are not racists...then it's only proper to add the infamous Margaret Sanger and her unabashed, present-day Progressive admirers to the list.
That's an excellent point Howler!
(You don't think he sells baby parts on the side, do you?)
You don't, right?
Actually this type of thing happens a lot, where the innocent party gets into more trouble than the perpetrators ....
It doesn't surprise me the way the left twists facts to fit their agendas.
The guy who was beat up in the video, Harris, was arrested for an attack he was responsible for back in August (He had a warrant out on him) Two of the people who beat up Harris in the video, have been arrested and charged.
The way this post made it sound is that Harris got beat up and then was arrested because those who beat him up were white. Unbelievable what some people will try to push off as the truth.
A black man who was brutally beaten in a parking garage during a deadly far right-wing rally in Charlottesville in August is now facing an arrest warrant, Virginia police said Monday.
In a statement, the Charlottesville Police Department said that DeAndre Harris, 20, was wanted for unlawful wounding in connection with the August 12 assault, according to NBC affiliate WVIR.
The arrest warrant against Harris was issued after an unidentified victim went to a local magistrate’s office, offering an account of the apparent wounding that was later verified by a detective, the statement said.
To date, two of Harris’ attackers have been arrested and charged with malicious wounding: 18-year-old Daniel Borden, of Cincinnati, Ohio, and Alex Ramos, 33, of Marrietta, Georgia, according to WVIR.
Then there are the stories and videos the left doesn't want anyone to see.
Boy you got that all screwed up.
The August 12 assault IS the assault pictured here.
I guess I should have put the word "also" before August.
Sounds like there was two assaults on that day in August after reading the various stories. One BY Harris, and one against him later.
Isn't it ironic that roits break out when a white cop shoots a black with cries of racism everywhere, and then when a riot breaks out when a black cop kills a black, the cries go out that it's cops kill blacks. Maybe if they didn't break the law and followed the cops instructions, they wouldn't be getting shot.
Where did any official report say that the people who beat Harris were Pro-Nazis? Or is that something you just added?
Like usual Vic, you come in, all indignant about whites beating up a black but ignore it when blacks beat up innocent whites.
I don't ignore it. It's pretty rare that they don't get punishment.
More often than not it is crimes against blacks that go unpunished no matter who the perpetrators are.
It goes back to an ingrained belief in America that blacks are an inferior race. I get that you might not agree but I am convinced that many people actually believe that in their hearts of hearts.
Of course you ignore it. Statistically, per capita, a white is 5 times more likely to be a victim of a black than visas versa.
Statistically, per capita, a black is less likely to be shot by police than a white.
When it comes to races Vic, there are differences. In a country where some like to believe everyone is equal, the facts say otherwise.
The Worldwide Pattern of IQ Scores. East Asians average higher on IQ tests than Whites, both in the U. S. and in Asia, even though IQ tests were developed for use in the Euro-American culture. Around the world, the average IQ for East Asians centers around 106; for Whites, about 100; and for Blacks about 85 in the U.S. and 70 in sub-Saharan Africa.
In other words, Asians have a higher IQ than whites. I accept that fact.
Whites have higher IQ's than blacks on the average.
Genetically, blacks are faster than whites.
As races, we are different.
Does this mean that I, or most others see Asians as the Superior race, followed by whites, and then blacks? Of course not. But lets be realistic. There are a lower percentage of blacks who will be qualifying for medical school than whites, and there is a lower percentage of whites that will qualify for medical school than Asians. Due to quota systems, many people who are not as qualified to get into medical schools are admitted ahead of more qualified people based solely on their skin color.
If people were equal, sports would only have about 13% black players.
OKEY DOKEY then. Thanks for playing today. Now move along.
Why don't you complain that black on black crime is virtually unreported? It's not an overstatement to say that the phenomenon of surging American homicide is largely the problem of black men and boys.
The under reporting is symptomatic of the problem. In our society black lives don't matter, and that needs to change. Until it does racism will continue.
Yeah, right. Cuz the media has no idea how to steer public opinion and junk. Symptomatic my ****. It's the left that hates minorities Vic - I'm shocked you can't see it. The left does everything it can to keep minorities from success.
Right or Left? Doesn't make a difference, and it won't make a difference until we stop seeing each other as 'minorities' and start seeing each other as brothers and sisters.
Then stop calling yourself a minority! Simple.
Agreed. It is perpetuated by all sides.
Not so much on the WEN though.
You know, the non-existent White Entertainment Network.
Or, the NAWP - The non-existent National Association of White People.
Your spelling it wrong. The first one is spelled "FOX" and the second one is spelled "KKK"
People who are proud of their white heritage are not white supremacists or Nazi's.
Why is it that every other race demands we honor and respect their racial heritage when they do nothing but ridicule and attack ours? I don't put up with it anymore and I am no longer silent about it. If someone wants respect, they better show it.
Nothing wrong with being proud.
Everything wrong with feeling superior.
Hence the term "white supremacy"
Do you have a clue what the black fist in the air signifies Vic? Black power and Black supremacy. (I grew up with it in the 60's and 70's)
Everything wrong with feeling superior.
You mean like the New Black Panther Party or other black supremacy groups?
Except black power doesn't mean black supremacy to all.
Those who do support black supremacy are racists and they are on the wrong side of the movement.
But EVERYONE that supports Trump is a Nazi? Racist? Bigot? Homophobe? Xenophobe? Phobephobe?
If you can't tell yet Vic - people are getting a little tired of this crap. Find a legitimate cause and support that! This BLM crap has a a foundation of lies, built with bricks of deceit and fostered by a progressive agenda.
Touched a nerve I see
Yeah, well you know, ... false, unfounded accusations of racism, bigotry will do that.
But, that's OK - amirite? After all, division, anger, promoting false premises - it all feeds the progressive agenda!
So we can clearly differentiate between the black supremacists (racists according to you) and the black powerists (not racists according to you), can you, or will you list some examples of who's who in the public eye within each category?
But whites who are proud of our heritage, didn't vote for someone based solely upon genitalia, refuse to be blamed for things we did not do, refuse to kowtow to the self-proclaimed, intersectionalized, namby-pamby "victims" demanding "diverse/multicultural" safe spaces that exclude whites (even their white "allies"), and/or refuse to self-censor to coddle the ever-expanding, deluded and indoctrinated, "marginalized" and "entitled" groups using identity politics to decry being stereotyped by others even as they lump all whites under labels such as "privileged", "racist", "homophobic", "sexist", "xenophobic", and "bigoted" are all white supremists???
And no, I am not jumping to conclusions as you clearly indicated exactly that by your use of the word "except" above. And y'all wonder why whites are pushing back. SMH
Got any examples of some names of black supremacists as opposed to black power-ists, such as I asked in the previous reply to you?
Name some prominent democrat blacks that have said anything bad about the New Black Panthers.
Vic, how is it that you are bringing these accusations of white supremacy and racism here?
JustJim for example - your implication is that he is a white supremacist. That's out of line Vic. You've made implications that I am racist! There are no grounds for such irresponsible comments.
This topic obviously hits your hot button. I think it might be best if you confine your statements to truth and reality - a touch of supportive documentation might be nice as well.
I agree it seems very wrong.At least there is vidio proof.
It is obvious from the two videos I am posting here that there is a bit more to this story than the brief clip inside the parking garage. There doesn't seem to be video available on YT that shows the scene from all of the angles it was recorded from, as there were clearly a number of cameras following the protestors/counter-protestors approaching the garage.
There were people behaving badly in both groups. Some worse than others. Some snippets look quite damning. Some are quite damning. But even those attending the rally cannot attest to each and every incident that happened that day, and certainly those of us that were not there cannot do so.
I could not find any report of what, precisely, the man beaten was charged with, so I'll not jump to conclusions.
Thanks that was a good answer.
I was going to post the first video, but I hadn't seen the second one before. What a clusterf#ck.
I may be naive, but I think we need to have faith in our judicial system.
For help please contact us here.
You're using the touch version of Amirite, you can switch to the full site.
© amirite.com 2017. Icons by DryIcons.