Hypocrisy

Protests and RalliesWhether your organization is lobbying to move forward a healthcare, financial or other social...

From the website: PROTESTS AND RALLIES Whether your organization is lobbying to move forward a healthcare, financial or other social initiative, we can organize rallies and get media attention for your causes and candidates. We also assist individuals, companies and political organizations with protests and picketing campaigns. We’ve protested governments, corporations and everything in between. We’ve achieved results on campaigns on everything from ending institutional discrimination in a religious organization to getting refunds and compensation for hundreds of homeowners who bought hazardous land from a real estate firm to forcing a patent trolling company to back down. Some of these campaigns are long and drawn out while others can be resolved quickly. Regardless, we endeavor to deliver campaigns that bring out the best qualities of our clients’ messages and to achieve tangible results.

Swipe to go to another post.

Trump loves fake news...and he has his own crowds to back him up.

It seems that people need fake and hyperbole to get anywhere.

+1   2  Reply

Sukiesnow 9 days ago

Seems as if it's a real thing for sure, but I hope not as far it being a wave of the future. I do know that many people who attend protests or rallies are not paid protesters, or those who have been solicited by any "Crowds on Demand" sort of organization.

I'm also pretty sure that my own feelings about a candidate, issue or cause are based on my own perceptions and "research" about them, as opposed to the size of a crowd supporting them or it.

+2   2  Reply

Piper2 9 days ago

In response to “Seems as if it's a //real// thing for...

I hope not, too...not looking good for the home team, though. It goes beyond paid crowds, there are bots, paid and volunteer trolls online in social media that are having an impact as well.

I don't doubt that with you, and with many others as well. I do see a vast number of people who simply follow the crowd, though. And most largely limit themselves to echo chambers these days, never questioning if a factual basis exists as long as it's someone they usually agree with. I find it both sad and scary.

+2   2  

Bozette 9 days ago

In response to “I hope not, too...not looking good for the...

I've been hearing about that, and reading some about it too.

Yes, I've been seeing an alarming amount of people who do that too, for most of my life. I doubt if it's so much of a these days thing, as much at it just being more glaringly obvious now.

+2   2  

Piper2 9 days ago

In response to “I've been hearing about that, and reading...

It is more obvious, to be sure, but it is more prevalent, too, imo...largely due to social media.

+2   2  

Bozette 9 days ago

In response to “It is more obvious, to be sure, but it //is//...

Social media is definitely when I starting noticing it even more.

+2   2  

Piper2 9 days ago

In response to “Social media is definitely when I starting...

Here's what I'm talking about:


Twitter has millions of users, yet this is a representation of their intraction by political leaning. It's basically two yuuuuuuuge echo chambers. And FB probably isn't much better.

A lot of smaller sites are just smaller echo chambers, too, but those are primarily the ones devoted to politics. We get a better mix on here, and we definitely had a good mix on SH.

+2   2  

Bozette 9 days ago

In response to “Here's what I'm talking...

Intraction? You're right, FB isn't much better. Both sides tend to run off those who dare to disagree with them in their groups, or block them. One side in particular tends to gang up on and mock even the most civil of disagreement.
I don't know much about how Twitter works, but I saw that same thing on SH, and to lesser degree, I see it here. It is disheartening. :/

+2   2  

Piper2 8 days ago

In response to “Intraction? You're right, FB isn't much...

*interaction* (chew)

Yup. I see it from both sides...different, but the same, if that makes any sense. What I find disconcerting is the tendency of people to serial "like" their "side" during a discussion without actually looking at links posted by anyone in the conversation...so they aren't even considering the information presented before weighing in. Smh

I see it on all sites to some extent, but there is more discussion here (believe it or not!), and I've never seen the level of interaction between opposing viewpoints as I saw on SH.

0    

Bozette 8 days ago

In response to “*int**e**raction* (chew) Yup. I see it from...

I figured that. Since unlike me, you rarely make typos or leave out words, I just wanted to be sure. :)

Yes, that makes sense. To me, anyway. I do think sometimes people don't actually need to look at any links posted in the conversation, because they've already done their own research. Also, sometimes the links are from sites that are so 'hateful' and obviously 'biased' that they're a little sickening.
Usually though, people just already have their minds made up, and aren't interested in looking at any stinkin' link .

With the obvious exception of those here (and formerly on SH) who insult and block every opposing viewpoint, I have also seen some good discussions on both sites.

+1   1  

Piper2 8 days ago

In response to “I figured that. Since unlike me, you rarely...

Arrgh...this stupid keyboard has been giving me fits, and typos galore.

True, but I guess I just try to actually look at something before weighing in on it. The particular conversation I was referring to was an Australian who posted a common (and misleading) meme on gun laws here in the states. He said, "I've done *the* research, fact check it.". As I am quite familiar with gun laws in Michigan, it was easily disproven. Mind you, I did not disagree with him on gun control, merely corrected a fallacy in the meme. Silly me...I think truth matters. (chew)

Agreed.

+1   1  

Bozette 8 days ago

In response to “Arrgh...this stupid keyboard has been giving...

I haven't noticed you having typos galore. Unfortunately I can't blame my keyboard for mine.

That would be nice. Personally, I always look at "source" links, when there is one. I don't usually weigh in on anything if don't already know something about it.
Yes, FACTS about something sure do matter.

+1   1  

Piper2 8 days ago

In response to “I haven't noticed you having typos galore...

This keyboard has been causing me to have a lot, but it's still on me for not double-checking before I post. I sometimes decide on different wording, or intend to add or delete something and don't proof it properly, too.

I often follow conversations without chiming in, but I learn a lot from both the links posted and the discussion sometimes.

Yeppers.

+1   1  

Bozette 8 days ago

Anonymous